FCRR
Publication
2001
Edited by Sumaila, U.R., and Alder, J.
Part 1 pages 1-92
Part 2 pages 93-145
Part 3 pages 146-197
Part 4 pages 198-245
ABSTRACT
This Report documents most of the presentations given at an international conference on the Economics of Maine Protected Areas (MPAs) on July 6 to 7, 2000 at the UBC Fisheries Centre. MPAs are areas in a marine habitat that are closed either partially or completely to fishing. They have recently been promoted as complements to traditional fisheries management in the literature. The conference sought to provide a forum for academics, government and private sector actors to present, share ideas, information and models for assessing the benefits of MPAs. The focus of the conference was on the analysis and modelling of economic and social aspects of MPAs. As the papers in this volume show, the presentations were multidisciplinary in scope, covering the state of the art in the analysis of the use of MPAs as management tools for sustainable fisheries.
Results reported at the conference include:
- protecting one of the subpopulations in a stochastic model reduces the sum of squared deviations of catches and effort while the average catch increases;
- to assess the potential benefits of MPAs to fisheries one needs to factor in possible benefits arising from improvements in habitat within reserves, and the lower management costs that MPA implementation could lead to;
- the success of MPAs hinges on the development of economic alternatives for former users of the areas protected;
- if the current fisheries management system is inefficient and no improvement is expected, it is very hard to provide an economic reason for introducing MPAs;
- incorrectly sized or located MPAs may increase the risk of depletion;
- small MPAs with artificial reefs achieve little to avert collapse of fisheries or shift towards catches of low trophic level species;
- accounting for the non-consumptive economic value of fish abundance and size may have a large impact on the economic viability of ecologically functional MPAs;
- in the presence of a limited entry license system, reserve creation can produce a win-win situation where aggregate biomass and the common license price increase;
- MPAs can have differential impacts on the various players involved in a fishery;
- the possibility of spatial heterogeneity in fish stocks implies that an MPA can impact on biodiversity in potentially undesirable ways;
- MPAs can help hedge against uncertainty, especially in cooperatively managed fisheries;
- the precautionary approach in fisheries management implies that economic loss due to the implementation of MPAs will have to be very large to make the establishment of MPAs economically unwise.
The reader is invited to explore further these and other results presented at the conference by reading the papers contained in this volume.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Evaluating MPA Management: A New Modelling Approach Alder, J., Sumaila, U.R., Pitcher, T. and Zeller, D. | 1 |
| Marine Reserves - will they accomplish more with management costs? A comment to Hannesson's (1998) paper Claire Armstrong and Siv Reithe | 11 |
| Marine Reserves: Is there an economic justification? Ragnar Arnason | 19 |
| MPAs in the North Sea: a preliminary bioeconomic evaluation using Ecoseed, a new game theory tool for use with the ecosystem simulation Ecopath with Ecosim Alasdair Beattie, Villy Christensen, Ussif Rashid Sumaila and Daniel Pauly | 32 |
| Costs and benefits of implementing a marine reserve facing prey-predator interactions Jean Boncoeur, Frederique Alban Olivier Thebaud and Olivier Guyader | 43 |
| Importance of MPAs and their Benefits: the local community's perspectives Ratana Chuenpagdee, Julia Fraga, Ricardo Torres, and Jorge Euan | 53 |
| An overview of socioeconomic Aspects of an Indonesian MPA: A Perspective from Kepulauan Seribu Marine Park Akhmad Fauzi and Eny Buchary | 62 |
| Contingent Valuation of Southern California Rocky Intertidal Ecosystems Darwin C. Hall, Jane V. Hall, Steven N. Murray | 70 |
| The Economics of Marine Reserves Rognvaldur Hannesson | 85 |
| Integrating Marine Protected Areas into Dynamic Spatial Models of Fish and Fishermen Daniel S. Holland | 93 |
| The value of a spill-over fishery for spiny lobsters around a marine reserve in northern New Zealand S. Kelly, A. B. MacDiarmid, D. Scott3 and R. Babcock | 99 |
| Marine reserves: designing cost effective options Kenton Lawson and Peter Gooday | 114 |
| The Potential Role of Marine Reserves in Selected Countries in East and Southern Africa. O.V. Msiska, N. Jiddawi and U.R. Sumaila | 121 |
| Lake Malawi National Park Fisheries: Basic Assessment of Benefits and Impact Edward Nsiku | 131 |
| Consequences of MPAs: an exercise in the Upper Gulf of California assessing immediate economic consequences of no-take zones Ivonne Ortiz | 140 |
| Spatial Ecosystem Simulation of No-take Human-Made Reefs in MPAs: Forecasting the Costs and Benefits in Hong Kong Tony Pitcher, Ussif Rashid Sumaila and Eny Buchary | 146 |
| Estimating the fishery benefits of fully-protected marine reserves: why habitat and behaviour are important Callum M. Roberts and Helen Sargant | 171 |
| A bioeconomic analysis of tropical marine reserve-fishery linkages: Mombasa Marine National Park Lynda D. Rodwell, Edward B. Barbier, Callum M. Roberts and Tim R. McClanahan | 183 |
| Are Marine Protected Areas in the Turks and Caicos Islands ecologically or economically valuable? Rudd, M.A., A.J. Danylchuk, S.A. Gore, and M.H. Tupper | 198 |
| The Impacts of Marine Reserves on Limited Entry Fisheries James Sanchirico and James E. Wilen | 212 |
| MPAs: Process, Privilege and Participation: a sociological discussion Victoria Silk | 223 |
| MPA performance in a game theoretic model of the fishery Ussif Rashid Sumaila | 229 |
| Papers in Abstract | 236 |
| General Discussion | 240 |
| Summary | 243 |

